vs the competition

ClockMe vs Everhour

Everhour is a developer-friendly time tracker that integrates deeply with GitHub, Jira, Asana, and Linear — embedding timer controls directly inside those tools. It's built for dev teams that want time tracking inside their project management workflow. But Everhour costs $8.50/seat/month with no meaningful free tier, and has no MCP or AI coding tool integration. If your work lives in Claude Code or Cursor rather than GitHub issues, ClockMe gives you better automation for free.

ClockMe
$0 — all features free for individuals
Best for: AI-first developers and solo consultants who bill by the hour
Everhour
No free tier (trial only) · $8.50/seat/mo
Best for: Dev teams that manage work in GitHub, Jira, Asana, or Linear and want native time tracking in those tools
Try ClockMe free →
Feature comparison
Feature
ClockMe
Everhour
Invoice PDF generation
Yes
Yes
GitHub / Jira / Linear integration
ClockMe has no native PM tool integration yet
No
Yes
AI / MCP auto-timer
Yes
No
Concurrent project timers
Yes
No
Project budget tracking
Yes
Yes
Idle detection
Yes
No
Historical billing rates
Yes
No
Focus Mode (site blocking)
Yes
No
Team reporting
Pro (coming soon)
Yes
Free plan available
Everhour is paid-only
Yes
No
CSV export
Yes
Yes
Where ClockMe wins
  • Free for individuals — Everhour has no free plan
  • AI/MCP auto-timer — Everhour has zero AI coding tool integration
  • Concurrent timers — run multiple client timers simultaneously
  • Historical billing rates — rates are preserved per entry
  • Focus Mode — site blocking while you work
Where Everhour wins
  • ·Native timer buttons inside GitHub issues, Jira tickets, and Linear tasks
  • ·Team-level time tracking and utilization reports
  • ·Deeper project management tool integrations
  • ·More mature multi-user approval workflows
Our honest take

Everhour is the right choice if your team manages work in GitHub issues or Jira and wants timer controls embedded in those interfaces. For solo developers using AI coding tools, ClockMe's MCP integration is more relevant — and it's free where Everhour charges $8.50/seat/month.

FAQ

ClockMe vs Everhour questions

I work heavily in GitHub issues — can ClockMe help?

Today, the best workflow is to use ClockMe via MCP in Claude Code while working on GitHub issues — you can tell your AI to start a timer on the relevant project. Native GitHub issue integration (timer buttons inside GitHub) is on the ClockMe roadmap.

Does Everhour have a CLI or MCP integration?

Everhour has no MCP server or AI coding tool hooks. Their integration model is browser-extension-based — it injects timer buttons into GitHub, Jira, and Asana UIs. ClockMe's MCP model operates at the AI tool layer, which is more relevant if you work in Claude Code or Cursor.

What's ClockMe's equivalent of Everhour's GitHub integration?

While ClockMe doesn't embed timer buttons inside GitHub yet, the MCP workflow in Claude Code means timers start automatically when you open a coding session — often more seamlessly than manually clicking a button on a GitHub issue. Native GitHub App integration is on the roadmap.

More comparisons
vs Clockify
ClockMe gives you more — free — and your AI controls it.
vs Toggl Track
ClockMe automates what Toggl makes you do manually.
vs Harvest
Harvest is built for agencies. ClockMe is built for solo billers.
vs RescueTime
RescueTime watches what you do. ClockMe's AI controls exactly what gets billed.
vs TimeCamp
TimeCamp automates for teams. ClockMe automates for AI developers.
vs Jira
Jira logs work. ClockMe tracks billable time — and generates the invoice.
vs Notion
Notion databases track everything. ClockMe tracks billable time accurately.
vs Timely
Timely guesses your time. ClockMe's AI controls it.

Ready to switch?

Free for individuals. No credit card. Works with your AI tools in 60 seconds.

Create free account →